EXTERNAL BENCHMARK / CHALLENGE 01

RESULT: FAIL

Predict first. Reveal the measurements second.

NACA 0012 at Mach 0.15 and Reynolds number 5.95 million. 18 operating points, three meshes per point, no omitted angles. The reference stays sealed until a complete prediction has been committed.

54 / 54 case attempts finished

Published snapshot: 2026-09-14T14:08:21.197091+00:00. This is not a live counter. Finished attempts can fail numerical checks.

Actual chronology

  1. 1. Input frozenCOMPLETE
  2. 2. Criteria frozenCOMPLETE
  3. 3. SolveCOMPLETE
  4. 4. Prediction frozenCOMPLETE
  5. 5. Reference unsealedCOMPLETE
  6. 6. ComparisonCOMPLETE
Timestamped event ledger →

Frozen result: FAIL

Numerical adequacy: FAIL. Experimental comparison: FAIL. A coefficient match cannot rescue failed numerical gates.

QuantityRMSELargest absolute errorExperimental gate
CD0.0796590.232675FAIL
CL0.6355321.420456FAIL

The complete polar, including poor agreement.

All eighteen lift and drag predictions against experiment, and the signed errors relative to frozen bounds
All three grids are shown. Fine-grid predictions supply the frozen comparison; no points are removed after reveal.
Inspect convergence, conservation, wall resolution and actual meshes
Fine-grid force and residual histories, boundary-flux imbalance across all grids, and medium-to-fine coefficient changes
SIMPLE iterations are not physical time. Conservation and stationarity are separate tests.
Wall y-plus histograms and fine-grid percentile and maximum values at each angle
Final per-face diagnostics are retained. Low y+ alone cannot establish physical-model adequacy.
Actual coarse, medium and fine mesh edges around the retained airfoil
Actual mesh edges from the retained cases, not a separate illustrative model.

The problem, without its answers.

NASA TM-4074, Table XIII, first subtable. Localized No. 180 grit strips at x/c = 0.05 on both surfaces. The full series spans −3.99° to 19.27°, including both near-zero points. The 36 targets are lift and drag coefficients across the polar, not a spatial pressure distribution.

What “blind” means here—and what it does not.

The deterministic solver processes cannot access the experimental reference. They receive the frozen generator and a fresh case directory inside network-disabled, non-root containers. They have no RAG, source paper, decryption key or inherited conversation.

The setup supervisor has seen the source and authored the numerical implementation. Source selection and supervisory setup are therefore not fully blinded. A separate input-only model review preceded the work, but it does not make this a double-blind experiment or exclude model pretraining familiarity. This record claims reference-withheld execution, not stronger independence.

The frozen numerical model

Geometry → mesh

Nominal NACA 0012 geometry and a projected C-grid. Coarse, medium and fine counts are fixed in advance; meshes, warnings and decks are retained. An exact as-built airfoil is not claimed.

Steady RANS → forces

OpenFOAM 10 simpleFoam, incompressible low-Mach approximation, and the Langtry–Menter transition model. All angles receive 2,000 SIMPLE iterations. Iterations are not physical time.

Transition, turbulence and wall-treatment assumptions

A near-surface intermittency constraint approximates transition at 5% chord. It does not resolve grit height, strip drag or exact trip equivalence. Inlet turbulence intensity is assumed at 0.1%, not presented as a measured tunnel value. Fine-grid y+ must satisfy its declared gate; thin-cell warnings remain visible.

The original model review's suggestion that the whole series is physically steady is not adopted. This is a bounded steady-model test. Oscillating forces fail acceptance; a stable RANS fixed point still does not establish physical steadiness.

Acceptance bounds, set before production.

CheckFrozen requirement
Experimental CL errorRMSE ≤ 0.10; maximum absolute error ≤ 0.20
Experimental CD errorRMSE ≤ 0.005; maximum absolute error ≤ 0.010
Medium → fine|ΔCL| ≤ 0.02; |ΔCD| ≤ 0.002 at every angle
Fine wall y+95th percentile ≤ 2; maximum ≤ 5
Stable force historyLast-window means and ranges must both pass; cancelling oscillations cannot pass on averages alone
Residuals and conservationInitial/final residual gates plus boundary-flux imbalance ≤ 0.1%
CoverageAll 18 angles and all three meshes retained, including failed cases

These are declared engineering utility bounds, not experimental confidence intervals. Per-point experimental uncertainty is unknown and cannot be used to widen thresholds after reveal.

Scientific commitments

ArtifactSHA-256
input.json827bb840cce7068cd09c0a292aea4efcd73a8d046c18c7e7eb1751fbefce3c73
reference.encbc70021062c16133cef3816ddea98a6e9fe54a60c1908ccdf7d03f60bada0184
preregistration.jsond82c98b1f835a52b88c7f355e738253741cb2aa0ae3216913cdad1993c985c6c
blind_prediction.json7b5e04d12e2e0be0aaefdec2eb29c1a9728f6f0ddbb90f2d6a72160742638e31
comparison.jsonf165ced785f6a23604e579a5b64b71261d80b78fd3c29b51c04befd45f069b46
Public commit anchors

Hashes establish byte identity, not scientific validity. Git provides auditable chronology, not an administrator-proof timestamp service.

Reproduce and audit

Permanent versioned files. The compact reproduction package holds the code, paper, figures and manifests; each full case archive is downloadable separately through the hashed index.

Preserved earlier checkpoints and development history

The preparation report and input-freeze checkpoint are historical records, not the current experiment status. Their bytes remain unchanged.

Engineering scope

This tests one nominal configuration, declared assumptions and a steady-model workflow. It does not establish exact transition equivalence, unsteady fidelity, design readiness, universal Aero validation or flight suitability. Numerical and experimental failures remain part of the record.